Home
Sunday, December 17, 2017
5:23:18 PM
Users online: 0   You are here >> Home > CPUs and Cooling

Forums | CPUs and Cooling Forums search
Forum FAQ
   
 Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 Next Page 
wPrime Multithreaded Benchmark
wwwww 
7/11/06 9:52:05 PM
Guru

Updated - as for bigger tests, there's always 32M and 64M, if I remove caching I should be able to make higher tests work smoother on systems with low amounts of memory.

-----

Deserted 
7/11/06 10:05:31 PM
Champion

Welcome to wPrime Beta 1.
Scanning System - Please stand by.
CPU Found: CPU0
Name: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+
Speed: 3003 MHz
L2 Cache: 512 KB
CPU Found: CPU1
Name: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+
Speed: 3003 MHz
L2 Cache: 512 KB
2 CPU(s) detected. Optimizing calculation.
Please select test.
1.) 256K
2.) 512K
3.) 1M
4.) 2M
5.) 4M
6.) 8M
7.) 16M
8.) 32M
9.) 64M
>7
Calculating Sqrts of first 16M Numbers
Thread 2 calculating from 8388608 to 16777215.
Thread 1 calculating from 0 to 8388608.
Thread 1 is 20% complete @ 4.734 seconds
Thread 2 is 20% complete @ 4.734 seconds
Thread 2 is 40% complete @ 9.218 seconds
Thread 1 is 40% complete @ 9.25 seconds
Thread 2 is 60% complete @ 13.703 seconds
Thread 1 is 60% complete @ 13.765 seconds
Thread 2 is 80% complete @ 18.187 seconds
Thread 1 is 80% complete @ 18.281 seconds
Thread 2 complete with 0 errors!
Time taken: 22.672 seconds
Thread 1 complete with 0 errors!
Time taken: 23.218 seconds
Process completed in 23.812 seconds.

if only this RAM would take tighter timings :)

edit: woohoo I'm actually leading something! not that it'll last :(


Edited by Deserted: 7/11/2006 10:06:46 PM

-----
X2 4200+ @ 3GHz 1GB Kingmax Hardcore DDR500 @ 2.5-4-4-8 Inno3d 7800GT Abit KN8 Ultra
If I start talking about birth, its probably best to ignore me, I'm turning into an evangelist!
Ubuntu 64 bit user

Quote by Takoma[/i

morgoth 
7/11/06 10:23:26 PM
Hero
Titan


I'm coming to get you....

I'll beat it :D

-----
*Naked* Opty 170||DFI NF4 UltraD||X1900XT 512 ||2Gb TEAM Xtreem UCCC||730Gb||Audigy2ZS||Enermax 535w SLI||Watercooled
Founder of **Atomic Hardcore Techno-Metal Club**

wwwww 
8/11/06 4:30:51 PM
Guru

Now all I need is Dual Clovertowns...*rubs hands together*...

-----

MyAlbanianAss 
8/11/06 7:26:53 PM
Overlord

it worked only once

now i get this error straight after i hit Enter

Run-time error '48.'

Error in loading DLL

-----
•4200+ 2.60ghz•A8N32-SLi-Deluxe•2GB-3500LLPRO 3326 1T 520mhz•BFG7900GTXOC 702/900•4x74GB Raptor RAID0•Seagate750GB •Antec"900"
•2xCMV 221D 22" 5ms LCDs @ 3360x1050

wwwww 
8/11/06 9:40:47 PM
Guru

Quote by MyAlbanianAss
it worked only once

now i get this error straight after i hit Enter

Run-time error '48.'

Error in loading DLL



Are you cd'd into the same directory as the exe? i.e. are you running it normally through explorer?


Edited by wwwww: 8/11/2006 9:40:58 PM

-----

Deserted 
8/11/06 11:29:06 PM
Champion

Quote by morgoth
I'm coming to get you....

I'll beat it :D



hehe thats fine, this chip can push another 150MHz if need be...

-----
X2 4200+ @ 3GHz 1GB Kingmax Hardcore DDR500 @ 2.5-4-4-8 Inno3d 7800GT Abit KN8 Ultra
If I start talking about birth, its probably best to ignore me, I'm turning into an evangelist!
Ubuntu 64 bit user

Quote by Takoma[/i

morgoth 
9/11/06 10:00:26 AM
Hero
Titan


Quote by Deserted
Quote by morgoth
I'm coming to get you....

I'll beat it :D



hehe thats fine, this chip can push another 150MHz if need be...



Hehe, you've got another bloody gem chip like that 3700+ you had I bet :P

I'll bench once I hit 3GHz on this 170

-----
*Naked* Opty 170||DFI NF4 UltraD||X1900XT 512 ||2Gb TEAM Xtreem UCCC||730Gb||Audigy2ZS||Enermax 535w SLI||Watercooled
Founder of **Atomic Hardcore Techno-Metal Club**

wwwww 
9/11/06 5:51:59 PM
Guru

Quote by zebra
No. Doing so would encumber the performance, thus devoid the point of the benchmark on the whole, which is a bummer :(.

So'k man. No biggie.



Actually come to think of it - it'll probably not run with wine as it uses the WMI (a windows thing) to identify how many (and what) CPU's are available.

-----

kRaZeD_ 
9/11/06 7:04:44 PM
Guru

This happens when i try and run it :< Specs in tag

AppName: wprime.exe AppVer: 0.0.0.1 ModName: msvbvm60.dll
ModVer: 6.0.96.90 Offset: 000889e8

 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-16"?>
<DATABASE>
<EXE NAME="wPrime.exe" FILTER="GRABMI_FILTER_PRIVACY">
<MATCHING_FILE NAME="wPrime.exe" SIZE="40960" CHECKSUM="0x80E78C10" BIN_FILE_VERSION="0.0.0.1" BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="0.0.0.1" PRODUCT_VERSION="0.00.0001" COMPANY_NAME="wwwww" PRODUCT_NAME="wPrime Beta 1" FILE_VERSION="0.00.0001" ORIGINAL_FILENAME="wPrime.exe" INTERNAL_NAME="wPrime" VERFILEDATEHI="0x0" VERFILEDATELO="0x0" VERFILEOS="0x4" VERFILETYPE="0x1" MODULE_TYPE="WIN32" PE_CHECKSUM="0x13FF5" LINKER_VERSION="0x0" UPTO_BIN_FILE_VERSION="0.0.0.1" UPTO_BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="0.0.0.1" LINK_DATE="11/05/2006 14:59:38" UPTO_LINK_DATE="11/05/2006 14:59:38" VER_LANGUAGE="English (United States) [0x409]" />
</EXE>
<EXE NAME="MSVBVM60.DLL" FILTER="GRABMI_FILTER_THISFILEONLY">
<MATCHING_FILE NAME="msvbvm60.dll" SIZE="1392671" CHECKSUM="0x22EC431F" BIN_FILE_VERSION="6.0.96.90" BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="6.0.96.90" PRODUCT_VERSION="6.00.9690" FILE_DESCRIPTION="Visual Basic Virtual Machine" COMPANY_NAME="Microsoft Corporation" PRODUCT_NAME="Visual Basic" FILE_VERSION="6.00.9690" INTERNAL_NAME="MSVBVM60.DLL" LEGAL_COPYRIGHT="Copyright © 1987-2000 Microsoft Corp." VERFILEDATEHI="0x0" VERFILEDATELO="0x0" VERFILEOS="0x4" VERFILETYPE="0x2" MODULE_TYPE="WIN32" PE_CHECKSUM="0x15B2FA" LINKER_VERSION="0x0" UPTO_BIN_FILE_VERSION="6.0.96.90" UPTO_BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="6.0.96.90" LINK_DATE="08/04/2004 07:59:12" UPTO_LINK_DATE="08/04/2004 07:59:12" VER_LANGUAGE="English (United States) [0x409]" />
</EXE>
<EXE NAME="kernel32.dll" FILTER="GRABMI_FILTER_THISFILEONLY">
<MATCHING_FILE NAME="kernel32.dll" SIZE="983552" CHECKSUM="0x4CE79457" BIN_FILE_VERSION="5.1.2600.2180" BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="5.1.2600.2180" PRODUCT_VERSION="5.1.2600.2180" FILE_DESCRIPTION="Windows NT BASE API Client DLL" COMPANY_NAME="Microsoft Corporation" PRODUCT_NAME="Microsoft® Windows® Operating System" FILE_VERSION="5.1.2600.2180 (xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158)" ORIGINAL_FILENAME="kernel32" INTERNAL_NAME="kernel32" LEGAL_COPYRIGHT="© Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved." VERFILEDATEHI="0x0" VERFILEDATELO="0x0" VERFILEOS="0x40004" VERFILETYPE="0x2" MODULE_TYPE="WIN32" PE_CHECKSUM="0xFF848" LINKER_VERSION="0x50001" UPTO_BIN_FILE_VERSION="5.1.2600.2180" UPTO_BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="5.1.2600.2180" LINK_DATE="08/04/2004 07:56:36" UPTO_LINK_DATE="08/04/2004 07:56:36" VER_LANGUAGE="English (United States) [0x409]" />
</EXE>
</DATABASE>



Edited by kRaZeD_: 9/11/2006 7:05:29 PM

-----
| E6600 @ 3.42Ghz | P5W DH Deluxe 1101 | 2Gb Corsair XMS2 PC-6400 Black | 7900GT 578/780 |

Deserted 
9/11/06 8:54:30 PM
Champion

Quote by wwwww
Quote by zebra
No. Doing so would encumber the performance, thus devoid the point of the benchmark on the whole, which is a bummer :(.

So'k man. No biggie.



Actually come to think of it - it'll probably not run with wine as it uses the WMI (a windows thing) to identify how many (and what) CPU's are available.



correct, I tried it with wine first :(

-----
X2 4200+ @ 3GHz 1GB Kingmax Hardcore DDR500 @ 2.5-4-4-8 Inno3d 7800GT Abit KN8 Ultra
If I start talking about birth, its probably best to ignore me, I'm turning into an evangelist!
Ubuntu 64 bit user

Quote by Takoma[/i

wwwww 
9/11/06 9:24:51 PM
Guru

Quote by kRaZeD_
This happens when i try and run it :< Specs in tag

AppName: wprime.exe AppVer: 0.0.0.1 ModName: msvbvm60.dll
ModVer: 6.0.96.90 Offset: 000889e8

 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-16"?>
<DATABASE>
<EXE NAME="wPrime.exe" FILTER="GRABMI_FILTER_PRIVACY">
<MATCHING_FILE NAME="wPrime.exe" SIZE="40960" CHECKSUM="0x80E78C10" BIN_FILE_VERSION="0.0.0.1" BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="0.0.0.1" PRODUCT_VERSION="0.00.0001" COMPANY_NAME="wwwww" PRODUCT_NAME="wPrime Beta 1" FILE_VERSION="0.00.0001" ORIGINAL_FILENAME="wPrime.exe" INTERNAL_NAME="wPrime" VERFILEDATEHI="0x0" VERFILEDATELO="0x0" VERFILEOS="0x4" VERFILETYPE="0x1" MODULE_TYPE="WIN32" PE_CHECKSUM="0x13FF5" LINKER_VERSION="0x0" UPTO_BIN_FILE_VERSION="0.0.0.1" UPTO_BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="0.0.0.1" LINK_DATE="11/05/2006 14:59:38" UPTO_LINK_DATE="11/05/2006 14:59:38" VER_LANGUAGE="English (United States) [0x409]" />
</EXE>
<EXE NAME="MSVBVM60.DLL" FILTER="GRABMI_FILTER_THISFILEONLY">
<MATCHING_FILE NAME="msvbvm60.dll" SIZE="1392671" CHECKSUM="0x22EC431F" BIN_FILE_VERSION="6.0.96.90" BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="6.0.96.90" PRODUCT_VERSION="6.00.9690" FILE_DESCRIPTION="Visual Basic Virtual Machine" COMPANY_NAME="Microsoft Corporation" PRODUCT_NAME="Visual Basic" FILE_VERSION="6.00.9690" INTERNAL_NAME="MSVBVM60.DLL" LEGAL_COPYRIGHT="Copyright © 1987-2000 Microsoft Corp." VERFILEDATEHI="0x0" VERFILEDATELO="0x0" VERFILEOS="0x4" VERFILETYPE="0x2" MODULE_TYPE="WIN32" PE_CHECKSUM="0x15B2FA" LINKER_VERSION="0x0" UPTO_BIN_FILE_VERSION="6.0.96.90" UPTO_BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="6.0.96.90" LINK_DATE="08/04/2004 07:59:12" UPTO_LINK_DATE="08/04/2004 07:59:12" VER_LANGUAGE="English (United States) [0x409]" />
</EXE>
<EXE NAME="kernel32.dll" FILTER="GRABMI_FILTER_THISFILEONLY">
<MATCHING_FILE NAME="kernel32.dll" SIZE="983552" CHECKSUM="0x4CE79457" BIN_FILE_VERSION="5.1.2600.2180" BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="5.1.2600.2180" PRODUCT_VERSION="5.1.2600.2180" FILE_DESCRIPTION="Windows NT BASE API Client DLL" COMPANY_NAME="Microsoft Corporation" PRODUCT_NAME="Microsoft® Windows® Operating System" FILE_VERSION="5.1.2600.2180 (xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158)" ORIGINAL_FILENAME="kernel32" INTERNAL_NAME="kernel32" LEGAL_COPYRIGHT="© Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved." VERFILEDATEHI="0x0" VERFILEDATELO="0x0" VERFILEOS="0x40004" VERFILETYPE="0x2" MODULE_TYPE="WIN32" PE_CHECKSUM="0xFF848" LINKER_VERSION="0x50001" UPTO_BIN_FILE_VERSION="5.1.2600.2180" UPTO_BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="5.1.2600.2180" LINK_DATE="08/04/2004 07:56:36" UPTO_LINK_DATE="08/04/2004 07:56:36" VER_LANGUAGE="English (United States) [0x409]" />
</EXE>
</DATABASE>



Edited by kRaZeD_: 9/11/2006 7:05:29 PM



Where did that info come from? Was it one of those sorry but blah, Windows error dialogs?

If so are you an Administrator? 'cause it's unable to get any info about the CPU's - sounds like there's a problem with the WMI and it can't access the CPU info. I'm modifying it so that you don't need this and you can set how many threads you want.

-----

kRaZeD_ 
9/11/06 9:36:01 PM
Guru

Yeah, its a blah blah windows error thing.

And yes, im an administrator.

Welcome to wPrime Beta 1.
Scanning System - Please stand by.
CPU Found: CPU0
Name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
Speed: 2404 MHz
L2 Cache: 4096 KB
CPU Found: CPU1
Name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
Speed: 2404 MHz
L2 Cache: 4096 KB
2 CPU(s) detected. Optimizing calculation.
Please select test.
1.) 256K
2.) 512K
3.) 1M
4.) 2M
5.) 4M
6.) 8M
7.) 16M
8.) 32M
9.) 64M
>1


So it gets the info. Any windows updates i should know about? I have SP2.

-----
| E6600 @ 3.42Ghz | P5W DH Deluxe 1101 | 2Gb Corsair XMS2 PC-6400 Black | 7900GT 578/780 |

wwwww 
9/11/06 9:59:36 PM
Guru

Oh hmm, so it's when you start the test? There's nothing really that might 'cause an error there, only possibilities there are that it creates a huge array for results (might be a lack of continuous memory space - but you have 2GB) or the threading.

Try this copy: http://www.wprime.net/wPrime-beta2.zip
Basically that removes the caching so should eliminate the first possiblity (it's test 5 for 16M on that).

It seems to be erroring on MSVBVM60.DLL - maybe there's something wrong with your copy of the Dll, tried on other systems?


Edited by wwwww: 9/11/2006 10:01:25 PM

-----

kRaZeD_ 
9/11/06 10:04:42 PM
Guru

Welcome to wPrime Beta 2.
Stressing CPU to prevent false clock reading.
Scanning System - Please stand by.
CPU Found: CPU0
Name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
Speed: 2404 MHz
L2 Cache: 4096 KB
CPU Found: CPU1
Name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
Speed: 2404 MHz
L2 Cache: 4096 KB
2 CPU(s) detected. Optimizing calculation.
>

Cant even do anything :< you broked it w-mans! :'(

Upload your copy of the DLL... Ill see if that fixes it. And no i havent tried any other systems, as my dad is using his PC and my sister has a celery 2.4 :P


Edited by kRaZeD_: 9/11/2006 10:05:42 PM

-----
| E6600 @ 3.42Ghz | P5W DH Deluxe 1101 | 2Gb Corsair XMS2 PC-6400 Black | 7900GT 578/780 |

wwwww 
9/11/06 10:07:42 PM
Guru

Quote by kRaZeD_
Welcome to wPrime Beta 2.
Stressing CPU to prevent false clock reading.
Scanning System - Please stand by.
CPU Found: CPU0
Name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
Speed: 2404 MHz
L2 Cache: 4096 KB
CPU Found: CPU1
Name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz
Speed: 2404 MHz

L2 Cache: 4096 KB
2 CPU(s) detected. Optimizing calculation.
>

Cant even do anything :< you broked it w-mans! :'(

Upload your copy of the DLL... Ill see if that fixes it. And no i havent tried any other systems, as my dad is using his PC and my sister has a celery 2.4 :P


Edited by kRaZeD_: 9/11/2006 10:05:42 PM



http://www.wprime.net/msvbvm60.dll

-----

kRaZeD_ 
9/11/06 10:16:48 PM
Guru

Still erroring...

Ill start closing programs :)

-----
| E6600 @ 3.42Ghz | P5W DH Deluxe 1101 | 2Gb Corsair XMS2 PC-6400 Black | 7900GT 578/780 |

wwwww 
9/11/06 10:19:30 PM
Guru

Hmm wierd...did you try this copy?
http://www.wprime.net/wPrime-beta2.zip

Type qt at the prompt. (help for other options for anyone else trying it - it's slightly faster - it eliminates the gap between the last thread completing and the results by removing the result caching - also uses much less memory)

-----

kRaZeD_ 
9/11/06 10:26:54 PM
Guru

Closed every program i could get away with, even closed blackbox (shell) and then it just said it couldnt load a DLL.

And omgs! i figured out beta 2!

I typed in all sorts of shit. Then put in "help".

Came back with:
help
lt
- Lists the test selection menu
exit
- Quits wPrime
st <test>
- Begins test <test>



Problem now is that its only using one core. But st 5 finished in 22.827 seconds.

Calculating sqrts of first 16777215 numbers.
Thread 2 calculating from 8388608 to 16777215.
Thread 2 is 20% complete @ 5.688 seconds
Thread 2 is 40% complete @ 11.358 seconds
Thread 2 is 60% complete @ 17.14 seconds
Thread 2 is 80% complete @ 22.827 seconds
Thread 2 complete with 0 errors!
Time taken: 28.469 seconds

Also i cant type anything or do anything after typing in a command. Have to close and open the program again.

-----
| E6600 @ 3.42Ghz | P5W DH Deluxe 1101 | 2Gb Corsair XMS2 PC-6400 Black | 7900GT 578/780 |

wwwww 
9/11/06 10:32:53 PM
Guru

Quote by kRaZeD_
Closed every program i could get away with, even closed blackbox (shell) and then it just said it couldnt load a DLL.

And omgs! i figured out beta 2!

I typed in all sorts of shit. Then put in "help".

Came back with:
help
lt
- Lists the test selection menu
exit
- Quits wPrime
st <test>
- Begins test <test>



Problem now is that its only using one core. But st 5 finished in 22.827 seconds.

Calculating sqrts of first 16777215 numbers.
Thread 2 calculating from 8388608 to 16777215.
Thread 2 is 20% complete @ 5.688 seconds
Thread 2 is 40% complete @ 11.358 seconds
Thread 2 is 60% complete @ 17.14 seconds
Thread 2 is 80% complete @ 22.827 seconds
Thread 2 complete with 0 errors!
Time taken: 28.469 seconds

Also i cant type anything or do anything after typing in a command. Have to close and open the program again.



Yeah that copy is just a working model I was working on at the time - not meant to be perfectly stable (the console thing I've since fixed - I just compiled it with the qt thing (basically test -5 to see if it's memoire related). Times should be slightly faster. st 5 on this comp finishes in about 2 minutes... (eist @ 800MHz on my laptop).

Can you show the entire input - 'cause it should return the status of thread 1 as well.


Edited by wwwww: 9/11/2006 10:35:37 PM


Edited by wwwww: 9/11/2006 10:42:19 PM

-----

 Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17  | Next Page 
Forums | CPUs and Cooling